Casino Review Evidence Checklist
This checklist explains the minimum evidence FoxyCasino expects before it presents an operator claim as verified. It is a reader resource and a correction standard—not a ranking or endorsement.
Evidence hierarchy
| Claim | Preferred evidence | When evidence is missing |
|---|---|---|
| Operator and licence | Named legal entity plus regulator record or official licence reference. | Mark “not independently verified”; do not imply a licence. |
| Bonus and wagering | Current operator terms with date, eligibility, wagering, expiry and maximum-bet rules. | Do not repeat the headline offer as a fact. |
| Minimum deposit and payment methods | Current cashier, banking page or published terms from the operator. | Mark unavailable rather than estimate. |
| Withdrawal speed | Published processing terms, separated from payment-provider delivery times. | Do not promise a payout timeframe. |
| Market availability | Current operator eligibility plus the relevant regulator or official market directory. | State that availability must be confirmed locally. |
How we label a fact
- Verified: supported by a dated first-party or regulator source that we recorded.
- Reported by operator: published by the operator but not independently confirmed elsewhere.
- Not independently verified: no adequate current evidence; the claim is not used for a rating.
Corrections and updates
Terms change. If you spot an error, send the page URL and a public source to our editorial contact route. We update or qualify material claims rather than silently replacing evidence. Read our full methodology, affiliate disclosure and responsible-gaming guidance.